http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-antimatter-lab.html
alchymista:

Anti-Matter Atoms to Address Anti-Gravity Question

For every particle in physics, there is an associated anti-particle, identical in every respect that scientists have yet measured, except that it holds an opposite electric charge.
Current theory holds that, at the birth of the Universe, matter and anti-matter were created in equal amounts. When they meet, however, they destroy each other in energetic flashes of light. The question has remained, then, why did any Universe come into being at all, and why is the one we see overwhelmingly made of normal matter?
One of the characteristics that may differentiate anti-matter is its gravitational behaviour. Most scientists believe that anti-matter will be attracted to normal matter. Others are not so sure; anti-matter may repel - it may “fall up”. That has implications for the question of why the Universe didn’t disappear into a grand flash of light just as soon as it formed. It also might help explain why the Universe is expanding ever more quickly.
It has simply been impossible to test the idea, but researchers at the University of California Riverside are getting closer to addressing the question once and for all.
They have created electron-positron pairs that are in stable orbits around one another - the result is called a positronium. The pairs are kept from bumping into and destroying each other by carefully dumping energy into them to create what are known as “Rydberg states”. 
Like the lanes of an automotive test track, particles can move into different orbits around one another if they reach higher energies, and these Rydberg positronium atoms are spun up to high energies, lasting for a comparatively long three billionths of a second. The team hopes to extend the method, up to a few thousandths of a second, preparing a beam of the artificial atoms and seeing just which way they fall.

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-antimatter-lab.html

alchymista:

Anti-Matter Atoms to Address Anti-Gravity Question

For every particle in physics, there is an associated anti-particle, identical in every respect that scientists have yet measured, except that it holds an opposite electric charge.

Current theory holds that, at the birth of the Universe, matter and anti-matter were created in equal amounts. When they meet, however, they destroy each other in energetic flashes of light. The question has remained, then, why did any Universe come into being at all, and why is the one we see overwhelmingly made of normal matter?

One of the characteristics that may differentiate anti-matter is its gravitational behaviour. Most scientists believe that anti-matter will be attracted to normal matter. Others are not so sure; anti-matter may repel - it may “fall up”. That has implications for the question of why the Universe didn’t disappear into a grand flash of light just as soon as it formed. It also might help explain why the Universe is expanding ever more quickly.

It has simply been impossible to test the idea, but researchers at the University of California Riverside are getting closer to addressing the question once and for all.

They have created electron-positron pairs that are in stable orbits around one another - the result is called a positronium. The pairs are kept from bumping into and destroying each other by carefully dumping energy into them to create what are known as “Rydberg states”. 

Like the lanes of an automotive test track, particles can move into different orbits around one another if they reach higher energies, and these Rydberg positronium atoms are spun up to high energies, lasting for a comparatively long three billionths of a second. The team hopes to extend the method, up to a few thousandths of a second, preparing a beam of the artificial atoms and seeing just which way they fall.

(via polymath4ever)

@3 months ago with 139 notes
)
#anti-matter #anti-matéria #gravity #anti-gravity #anti-gravidade 
  1. disorder-state reblogged this from polymath4ever and added:
    //www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-antimatter-lab.html
  2. davidcustiskimball reblogged this from scinerds and added:
    Physics, UncommonSenseVsCommononsense, History, Humor, Mathematics Please, a theory of ‘particle justice’, that equal...
  3. confusionforbreakfast reblogged this from alchymista
  4. yari07 reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  5. trainthatwilltakeyoufaraway reblogged this from antiantimatter
  6. unseenquantum reblogged this from hadron94
  7. amorsanguinis reblogged this from alchymista
  8. theweirdthewonderful reblogged this from newslang77
  9. newslang77 reblogged this from scinerds
  10. bathoryrocker reblogged this from phyz
  11. scientifictesseract reblogged this from hadron94
  12. arielnietzsche reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  13. socialsteve04 reblogged this from subatomiconsciousness and added:
    Too damn interesting!!
  14. wpyrokinesisq reblogged this from hadron94
  15. phyz reblogged this from hadron94
  16. celestialist reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  17. thefinal-frontier reblogged this from subatomiconsciousness
  18. avarenity reblogged this from hadron94
  19. skythaz reblogged this from hadron94
  20. hadron94 reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  21. subatomiconsciousness reblogged this from likeaphysicist
  22. likeaphysicist reblogged this from scinerds
  23. neverwasiever reblogged this from scinerds
  24. alchymista posted this